Skip to content
Capra Digitals

Lead scoring sales trusts, and routing that never drops a lead

Most scoring models are invented in a marketing offsite and ignored by sales within a month. We build ours backwards from your closed-won deals, then review the model against outcomes every quarter.

Basis
Fitted to your closed-won history, not a generic template
Structure
Fit score and intent score kept separate
Routing
Territory, round-robin or account-based, with fallbacks
Governance
Quarterly review against actual conversion outcomes

In short

How should lead scoring be built?

Build lead scoring from evidence, not opinion: analyse which attributes and behaviours your closed-won deals actually shared, weight fit and intent separately, keep the model small enough to explain in one sentence, and review it quarterly against outcomes. Pair it with routing rules and SLA timers so a high-scoring lead reaches a named rep within minutes.

  • Basis: Fitted to your closed-won history, not a generic template
  • Structure: Fit score and intent score kept separate
  • Routing: Territory, round-robin or account-based, with fallbacks
  • Governance: Quarterly review against actual conversion outcomes

Signals

Signs the model is not working

  • Sales ignores the score

    Reps work their own list because the scored leads did not convert last quarter.

  • Leads sit unworked

    Nobody owns the follow-up window and good enquiries go cold over a weekend.

  • Routing has no fallback

    When the assigned rep is on holiday, the lead simply stops.

  • The model was never reviewed

    It was set up two years ago against a product that has since changed.

What you get

What we build

01 /

Evidence-based scoring model

We analyse closed-won versus closed-lost to find the attributes that genuinely correlate, then build the model on those.

Explore
  • Closed-won attribute analysis
  • Separate fit and intent scores
  • Negative scoring for disqualifiers
  • Score decay for stale engagement
02 /

Routing and rotation

Rules for territory, segment or account ownership, with round-robin, capacity caps and out-of-office fallbacks.

Explore
  • Territory and segment routing
  • Round-robin with capacity limits
  • Holiday and absence fallbacks
  • Account-based ownership rules
03 /

SLA and escalation

Timers on first response, alerts when they breach, and a report that shows who is actually meeting them.

Explore
  • First-response SLA timers
  • Breach alerts to managers
  • Escalation and reassignment rules
  • SLA compliance reporting
04 /

Feedback loop

A quarterly review comparing score bands to real conversion rates, and a mechanism for reps to flag bad leads.

Explore
  • Score band conversion reporting
  • Rep feedback capture on lead quality
  • Quarterly model recalibration
  • Documented change history

How it runs

From guesswork to a working model

  1. 01

    Analyse history

    Look at what closed-won leads had in common and, just as importantly, what the losses had.

  2. 02

    Draft and pressure-test

    Score the last two quarters retrospectively. If the model would not have surfaced the deals you actually won, it changes.

  3. 03

    Build with routing and SLAs

    Scoring, assignment, timers and alerts built together, because a score with no routing behind it changes nothing.

  4. 04

    Review quarterly

    Conversion by score band, rep feedback and a recalibration. Models decay; scheduled reviews stop them decaying silently.

Questions

Straight answers

The questions we get asked on almost every call about this work.

Do we need HubSpot Enterprise for lead scoring?

Predictive and multiple custom scores need higher tiers, but a single well-built score property with workflows works on Professional. We design to the tier you have.

How many criteria should a scoring model have?

Few enough that a rep can explain why a lead scored highly. In practice that is usually eight to fifteen weighted criteria, split across fit and intent.

What if we do not have enough closed-won history?

Then we start with a fit-only model built on your ideal customer profile, keep it deliberately simple, and add behavioural weighting once there is data to fit against.

How fast should leads be routed?

Assignment should be instant and the first-response SLA is typically measured in minutes for inbound demo requests. We build the timers and the reporting to hold that.

Can you route to teams rather than individuals?

Yes — pooled queues, territory teams and account-based ownership are all supported, with capacity caps and fallbacks.

Next step

Score leads on evidence, not opinion

Give us access to two quarters of closed deals and we will show you what your winning leads actually had in common.